There is a rapid shift in auditing practice with the integration of audit data analytics (ADA) tools. As the audit landscape changes, the question arises: How can educators effectively integrate ADA into the existing auditing curriculum to better equip students for the future of auditing? An illuminating study by Booker, Pelzer, and Richardson, published in the Journal of Accounting Education in 2023, provides compelling insights into this question.
A Change in the Audit Landscape
With the increased adoption of ADA in audit practice, auditing is transforming from traditional methods of sampling transactions to analyzing full populations of data. This transformation entails a critical need for new skills among auditors, including data mining, programming, machine learning, and multivariate statistics.
There is now an acute need for audit educators to determine how, where, and to what extent ADA should be integrated into the auditing curriculum. This presents a challenge as the business community often lacks clarity in expressing their expectations. However, it is a challenge that needs to be addressed as it is in line with the AACSB’s requirement for data analytics integration into the curriculum.
Early-Career Auditors and ADA
Booker, Pelzer, and Richardson addressed this gap by interviewing early-career auditors who, having recent experience in using ADA in their auditing practice, can provide valuable insights. It’s worth noting that most early-career auditors still rely primarily on traditional tools, like Excel, with the use of advanced ADA tools like Power BI and Alteryx being relatively limited.
The auditors also stressed the importance of being able to interpret ADA output rather than simply knowing how to navigate advanced ADA tools. Interestingly, despite ADA’s perceived importance in the industry, the training provided by firms tends to focus on navigating these advanced tools, rather than on interpreting the ADA output.
ADA in the Auditing Curriculum: Changing the Approach Not the Content
Rather than suggesting the removal of content from the auditing course to make room for data analytics, the interviewed auditors advocated for integrating ADA within existing content. They suggested that educators could change how they teach, instead of what they teach.
This approach has a practical edge to it. It allows students to directly apply ADA tools in hands-on examples and case studies. Such direct application can help students develop critical thinking skills necessary for interpreting ADA results.
Conclusion
As the use of ADA in auditing practice continues to grow, so does the necessity to adapt the auditing curriculum to meet this new demand. The insights provided by Booker, Pelzer, and Richardson demonstrate that this does not need to involve a complete overhaul of the auditing curriculum1. Rather, a change in teaching approach, focusing on integrating ADA within existing content, can be a manageable and effective solution.
Educators should heed these findings, which provide valuable guidance on how to successfully bridge the gap between theory and practice in the realm of auditing education. It will undoubtedly aid in equipping future auditors with the necessary skills to navigate the transforming landscape of the auditing profession.
You can access the article here.